Coming Soon to the Heights Plaza; Booze, Burgers, and Loans ... and Apartments?

Got an interesting email arrived in my inbox last night regarding the ORR development, which is the smaller development across the street from the proposed Walmart development. Bear in mind that anytime a big box opens up, there is bound to be any number of other strip centers and stores near it. In this case, the Orr develppment is not related to the Walmart development (Although at one time, I've been told they were all going to do the massive project(s) together).

So, the list of tennants on the ORR development goes something like this right now:

Smashburger (Burgers)
Jimmy Johns (Sandwiches)
Tutti Frutti (fruit related frozen yogurt)
Heights Liquors and Fine Wines (Booze)
Lovett Dental (mouthcare)
Aqua Cleaners (Cleaners)

The kicker that I wasn't aware of is that it also advertises 280 Apartments to be built on the adjacent 3+ acre plot, which can only be the big square of land between Yale and Heights bordering the RR Tracks on its south side.

Here's the text of the email:

Heights Marketplace is under construction and we have only 3 spaces left:

·        1,375/sf (25’ of frontage) between Smashburger and Jimmy Johns

·        1,139/sf (20’ of frontage) between Tutti Frutti and Batteries Plus

·        1,980/sf (36’ of frontage) between Batteries Plus and Loan Depot

·        55’ bay depth allows for maximum frontage

·        33’ high pylon signs on Yale @ Koehler and Heights Blvd. (great visibility to I-10)

·        280 upscale apartments will be built on the adjacent 3.52 acre “Tract A”

·        Dynamic new retail corridor

·        Super Wal-Mart under construction across the street, to open Fall 2012

·        Property has direct access to Yale, Heights and Koehler

·        Shell building delivered to tenants in late January 2012

·        New services roads and on/off ramps at I-10 and Yale/Heights to be completed by Spring 2012

·        Yale @ Koehler will become a signalized intersection

·        Join our dynamic tenant lineup….. Smashburger, Jimmy Johns, Aqua Cleaners, Tutti Frutti, Batteries Plus, Loan Depot, Great Clips, Heights Liquors and Fine Wines and Lovett Dental

And here's a link to the flyer from ORR:

http://www.orrcommercial.com/properties/pdf/Heights-Marketplace.pdf

Couple of other revealing things about the email and flyer:

-Starbucks on Koehler extension - News, but not surprised here. Have been wondering when they were going to open something up near Washington Ave. Shepherd and I-10 is apparently not close enough. But it is a virtual Starbucks desert in between Shepherd and downtown, given its saturation in other parts of the city.
-Verizon Store on Koehler - news ...
-Chase Bank in Walmart parking lot - which was known
-Taco Cabana in Walmart parking lot - Late night shoppers and Washington Ave bar patrons rejoice
-Heights marketplace to open in January 2012
-Walmart planned to open in Fall of 2012


At least we can be thankful that the Walmart will be here before the apocalypse.

Mayor Parker Won an Award

Mayor Parker won an award for local climate protection. The award was given by the US Conference of Mayors and Walmart. Here is a copy of the text of the statement: 

Baltimore, MD – Houston, TX Mayor Annise Parker and Evanston, IL Mayor Elizabeth Tisdahl have been selected as the nation’s top winners in the 2011 Mayors’ Climate Protection Awards, an initiative sponsored by The U.S. Conference of Mayors and Walmart.

Yes, that says 'and Walmart.'  So, the mayor's office works with the developers to allow Walmart to build a monstrosity of a big box store in the middle of my residential neighborhood, and the mayor gets an award.  

Awesome. 

**Backup of the Award Information, in case the above link gets taken down ... http://usmayors.org/79thAnnualMeeting/documents/BestPractices2011ClimateAwardWinners.pdf.**

Pink Spray Paint is Not Necessarily Graffiti

The pink 'graffiti' on Yale, Bonner, Koehler, and Bass Streets. These markings are where the holes will be bored for the next Geo survey for recommendations on road and slab grades. 

Its amazing sometimes to me what happens when you're nice to people. 


I happened upon a couple of polite gentlemen with a pink spray can on Bonner street this evening. After a brief joke about reporting them for gang graffiti, I asked what they were doing. 


'Its indirectly for the Walmart project' replied one of the men. 


They continued on to explain that they were supporting an additional study by Kimley Horn. If you remember, Kimley-Horn is the firm responsible for working with Ainbinder on the Traffic Impact Analysis study (TIA) for the development.


So as was explained to us, the first Geological study was done by a firm called Terracon. I'm not an expert, but what I can gather is that such a study is what is used to make recommendations for grades of roads and slabs for the development itself.  How do I know? I'll get to that in a minute ... 


According to our talk this evening, the Terracon study was not acceptable to Ainbinder, which is why they were out there; to mark with the pink spray paint where to bore holes to complete their own studies of the ground below. Apparently, the recommendations made by Terracon put construction for the development 'out of budget', and Ainbinder needed to get 'someone else to sign off' on a different recommendations.  According to the gentlemen, the recommended street grades from the Terracon study were so thick that 'a plane could have landed on them'. 


So here's the summary ... 
-Terracon did a drilling study for Ainbinder
-Terracon recommended high quality pavement, foundations, and drainage
-Terracon's recommendations = mucho dinero ($$$$$$) 
-Ainbinder doesn't want to spend mucho denero ($$$$$)
-Kimley-Horn is now doing another study so that Ainbinder doesn't have to spend mucho dinero


Love it when science is fiscally convenient. 


So, what the heck does a geological survey mean, do, or say. Thanks to the magic of the 'Les Paul' themed Google search (have you played that thing yet?), I found this, which is the 'Geotechnical Engineering Report' prepared for Ainbinder Heights LLC by Terracon consultants, April 19, 2011. 


Here are a couple of morsels: 


-Building slab and foundation performances described in this report are based on effective drainage for the life of the structures and cannot be relied upon if effective drainage is not maintained.
-Exposed ground should be sloped away from the structures for at least 10 feet beyond the

perimeter of the structures. After building construction and landscaping, we recommend

verifying final grades to document that effective drainage has been achieved. 

-we highly recommend that the near-surface soils be prepared as stated below to reduce the potential for slab movement associated with volumetric changes of the near-surface clay soils due to moisture variations to a more acceptable level. The actual movements could be greater if poor

drainage, ponded water, and/or other sources of moisture are allowed to infiltrate beneath the structure after construction.

-The final exterior grade adjacent to the building addition should be sloped to promote effective drainage away from the buildings.

-the subgrade is not suitable for heavy construction traffic prior to paving.

-Detailed traffic loads and frequencies were not available. However, we anticipate that traffic will consist primarily of passenger vehicles combined with garbage trucks and large multi- axle delivery trucks from time to time in the driveway areas.

There is a lot of detail about pavement component thickness', and other items that I am not an expert in. But fortunately, there are a bunch of experts out there that have donated their time to help those of us that aren't, understand all of this better. So, until Ainbinder decides that he has a scientific study that suits his pocketbook, I guess we can have some fun with the Terracon study. 

Sadly, the city has thus far not required drainage on the site. So despite the scientific study telling them they need it, I guess Ainbinder and Wal-Mart know far better.


**UPDATE**
Got the original report to work ... See Here ... 


What's also important to note is that this report states there must be proper drainage, yet Kimley-Horn has already stated that there will be no on-site detention  although the 380 Agreement directly obligates the city to purchase 'detention improvements' ... Really Andy Icken?  


Look folks, this isn't good for you ... the people of Houston.  These guys come in, get city funds to build, obligate the city to pay, are told by people they hire that they have to have proper water control measures, don't like the answer, and then pay someone else until they get the answer they want.  What the hell sense does this make? 


Lets not forget that next week, City Council is discussing the budget, which has already included layoffs of public workers. 


C'mon folks ... we can do better. 

-

Ruh Roh (Again)

So, a whole bunch of interesting news came out yesterday and today about Walmart.

First off at MSNBC, Walmart is struggling to keep its customers.

The company has taken nine months to restore thousands of grocery items, including some bestselling brands, it dumped from its shelves two years ago. The idea was to tidy up stores for the wealthier customers it had won during the recession. 

Grocery sales have improved, rising in the low single digits in the first quarter. But overall traffic at its U.S namesake stores has been down and revenue at stores open at least a year has posted eight straight quarters of declines on a year-over-year basis.

Thats a whole lot of bad news in its own right. To counter, they've been promoting the opening of smaller stores, which is beginning to take front and center attention now:

To address the increasing threat of dollar stores, Wal-Mart will open the first of up to 20 Walmart Express stores planned for this year. These stores are a tenth the size of a supercenter, or about the size of a typical drug store. Wall Street analysts and the media are expected to get a first look at a Walmart Express store Thursday. The store, in Gentry, Ark., will open later in June.


But this all seems contrary to the pep rally, err, shareholders meeting held today ... 

"We made a lot of progress over the last 11 months," said Bill Simon, president and CEO of Wal-Mart's U.S. business in an address to shareholders. "We have the right plan."

So why change it then? If the SuperCenter method is working for you (it isn't), then why focus on smaller stores? Why are you testing new ways to bring in big revenue (appliances)? 

I get that companies have to grow, but cmon now ... You can't tell shareholders that you have the right plan after posting 8 straight quarters of losses.

They're also trying to 'Win' in the Online Market ... 

“Wal-Mart CEO Mike Duke appears to be setting the company up for a run at Amazon in his comments at the Wal-Mart annual meeting today.
“Wal-Mart ‘will not just be competing’ in global ecommerce, Duke says. ‘We will play to win.’
“Wal-Mart has been making purchases and growing internally to build up its online operation, which is in synch with its brick-and-mortar stores through programs like online ordering with pick-up in stores.”

Hey, online ordering, and in store pickup? Gee Golly, what a great idea. Welcome to 2005 Mr. Duke.

Here's what it boils down to ... Walmart, like lots of US Business', has had a rough go of it in the past couple of years. Problem is, they've pushed so many people around for so long that the competition smells blood in the water, and rightly so (See Venture, Zayre's, Kmart), and And a lot of it has to do with situations very similar to this one right here.  Hugely expensive Supercenters that are not profitable, and in a lot of cases, not popular. Why on earth do they need 3 Supercenters within a 5 mile radius of one another? They don't. But its the bullheaded thinking of WM's management that has gotten them into messes like this in the first place.

Perhaps the Walton family themselves are beginning to agree ...

Walmart has tried several initiatives to turn around its domestic operations. All have failed. The latest plan is to open smaller Walmart Express outlets. These locations will be about 10% the size of normal Walmart stores, and will stock primarily food and general merchandise. At the same time, Walmart's Sam's Club unit will begin to offer more groceries.

If this new plan doesn't work, pressure will increase for the board to consider removing CEO Michael Duke (pictured). The success of his tenure has been questioned before, but the board's role is not often discussed. 

Walmart's board didn't have any trouble ousting former CEO Lee Scott, who served from 2000 to 2009. His record on labor and the environment was criticized for years. The Waltons may decide that it is time to find a replacement for Duke to see if a new candidate can turn U.S. retail operations around.

Time will tell folks.

Why The Walmart On My Street Is Going to Suck

I was initially going to call this entry, 'Why we are right', but figured the title I chose was probably a bit more noticeable.

So nearly a year ago, Ainbinder not only announced that they were intending to make tens of millions of dollars by selling land to a Walmart on my street, and taking 6 million in public money to do it (See all things '380' related), but that Walmart was also beginning to build a new Supercenter on I-10 and Silber. That's about 3.5 miles away.

So, the Supercenter at I-10 and Silber got built, against resident's wishes. 

And as expected, its already bringing problems ...

Many of the neighborhood’s 250 residents were concerned that traffic coming off I-10 would use their side streets as a driveway for the new Walmart, which opened within the past few weeks. Rather than install gates in the neighborhood, which the city’s legal department said would be a liability of emergency vehicles couldn’t get though, city officials decided to build a median that would make it impossible for northbound drivers to turn left into Afton Village.
But landlord and business owner Dan Riley said his 70 tenants are having a very tough time getting to their apartments. “(Walmart) is bringing economic development to the east side of Silber, (but) they've basically said we don't want the west side of Silber developed," Riley said. At least a half dozen other business on the west side of Silber have also complained of slumping sales since the median was installed. Drivers heading north are now forced to drive a half-mile before they can make a U-turn to head south. "I've been late to church the past two Sundays,” said Beverly Humphrey, who fears her favorite convenience store will close due to the median. “There's only one way in and out."A Walmart spokesperson did not immediately return a request for comment on Sunday.


Houston CM Brenda Stardig basically summed up the city's involvement in this one ...

"This is the least restrictive (solution),” Councilmember Brenda Stardig said at a recent meeting. “And it's still not to the (neighborhood’s) satisfaction but this is what we've got."


Its very fair to note that CM Stardig voted in favor of giving the development on my street the 380. So, when a public official is throwing their hands up to say 'this is the best we've got' to the public's frustration with a company, while on the other hand, voting to give tax money to benefit that same company, then not only are they a pretty weak politician, but its also fair to question whether they've got the public's best interests in mind.

And even beyond this, it demonstrates clearly that unless you get a group like RUDH and StopHeightsWalmart going and causing a noticeable ruckus, then no one is going to care what the individuals or even the neighborhoods say. A good piece of advice from a local politician that I once received was:

'Sometimes you have to drop bombs first, then ask questions later.'

In this case, because they did not have a chance to drop bombs, a massive Walmart development is now costing neighborhood residents in quality of life, and costing local businesses their livelihood.

"... but this is what we've got."

I'm sorry that the I-10 and Silber folks are having a rough go. I do not envy their position, and I know the Civic volunteers are trying hard to preserve their neighborhood.

In our neighborhood, we're going to have to continue to demand better until the folks involved with this thing quit being pompous and ignorant.

Developers Like Ainbinder are Happy Being Less Than Awesome ...

I have long known that the folks on the other side of this discussion read this blog, follow the FB group, and watch the local media outlets for stories.  They have gone so far as to hire PR Firms, create anonymous FB profiles to comment back and forth in the FB group, and comment on this blog.  Need proof, See Here ...

That said, this post is for you folks ...

If you haven't done it yet, go read this article ... Its really quite good.

As a summary:
-Nathan Norris came to town
-Mr. Norris works with Placemakers
-Placemakers promotes efficient planning and urban usage (Mixed Use, walkable developments)
-Mr. Norris believes Houston is not living up to its potential

"My one big take-away from my visit to Houston was that Houston has the greatest potential to be America's most worldly city,"

Thats a pretty big deal ... so what gives?

We don't have rules, guidelines, or the correct incentives. While some developers take chances in putting up great urban spaces like West Avenue and City Centre, Ainbinder gets millions to put up a strip mall with fast food drive throughs in the middle of my neighborhood. ... What the hell kind of sense does that make?

Right now, you folks (And again, I'm talking to you developers and Moody Rambin folks) don't have a plan. You have a picture of a strip mall with no train tracks, no houses around it, that is apparently built on an open field of green where ferries and unicorns prance and eat jellybeans.
But there's no plan to make it great. You pave a field, put up some one story buildings, and say you're done ... but thats not greatness folks.

You're playing in the minor leagues.

"Underperforming" was a word he used frequently. Our lax rules about development, he said, not only mean that our daily lives are poorer for streets edged with garage doors instead of trees.
They also mean that Houston's developers aren't making as much money as they could from their projects - and that taxpayers don't reap the full potential of their investments in public space.
Norris argued that despite Houston's enormous advantages - warm weather, a business-friendly environment, thriving economy, water supply, friendliness - our disjointed approach to building the city is holding us back.

But perhaps thats what the developers are happy with. Its safe to continue in a string of 'developments' that require little creativity, and less ingenuity.

Well, its a good article ... good ideas ... and I hope to live somewhere that will aspire to be much greater than it already is, and have a grander vision than a brick facade strip mall at some point in time soon.

There Was A Protest This Past Weekend

It was almost like old times.  The media was out, and there were quite a few neighbors and friends out at the Yale Street bridge this past Saturday, including CM Gonzalez.

As most of you are aware, the Yale Street bridge is in pretty bad shape. This is made worse because the development(s) are going to be bringing more traffic and 18 wheelers over it, which isn't a good thing.

So, a protest was held over the weekend at the Bridge to raise awareness.

Here's some pretty good coverage over at ABC 13.

At 2:21 in the video, we get this message from CoH Public Works:

'The Yale Street Bridge will require upgrade or replacement in the foreseeable future, and PWE continues to explore all options for funding such work.'



Here's where you can get $6 Million to start ...

The Community Wrote A Letter

For several months, the community has been putting forth a lot of noise about the traffic issues regarding the Washington Heights Development. Councilman Gonzalez has supported the efforts of the community, and other Council Members have also spoken in support of the community on this one, especially CM Noriega, CM Jones, and CM Rodriguez. 


So, the neighborhood coalitions decided to get together to author a joint position statement. You can read the complete statement here: 


http://rudh.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Joint-Position-Statement-Version-5m4.pdf


The basic rundown of the letter is this: 
-Fix the Yale Street bridge - its old and in disrepair, and by running lots of development traffic on it, including 18 wheelers, it will break. The traffic this development will create could very well be the catalyst for the collapse of the bridge, which would be a pretty bad thing. 


-Close Heights to 18 wheeler traffic - While Heights Blvd North of I-10 is presently designated this way, the letter asks that Heights be closed to 18 wheeler traffic for the length of the street, which ends only a few blocks to the south of I-10 at Washington. Thus, keeping that portion of Heights open to 18 wheeler traffic, while closing the rest of it, looks to favor the development and not the community. 


-Close off Bass Street - As previously covered in detail, Bass Street as an entrance to the development is a pretty lousy idea. The Developer's Traffic Study essentially says that not a lot of traffic is going to use this route, yet they claim it is essential to the project. What sense does that make? 


-The conclusion of the letter sums it up pretty well: 

"Our neighborhood spirit and sense of community are strong in these beliefs and recommendations. We encourage you, our civic leaders, to ultimately heed what is in the best interest of the greater public, and not sacrifice safety for the benefit of private development."

Can't really say it better than that right there. Here's the community, going to our elected officials, unified, saying please fix these things ... and if they're just talked at, and not fixed, then why would the community have any faith in the elected officials any longer? What more do they need?

These aren't unreasonable requests ... fix a bridge so it doesn't collapse and restrict traffic thats unwanted and unnecessary through neighborhoods. 

If nothing else, its a public safety issue. If you recall the collapse of the I-35 Bridge in Minnesota a few years's back. 13 people were killed, and school bus including 60 children was involved. Of course the bridge was old, but the catalyst for the collapse was resurfacing:

The construction taking place in the weeks prior to the collapse included joint work and replacing lighting, concrete andguard rails. At the time of the collapse, four of the eight lanes were closed for resurfacing,^{[47][48][49][50]} and there were 575,000 pounds (261,000 kg) of construction supplies and equipment on the bridge.^[51]

Part of what the '380' calls for is resurfacing of the Yale Street Bridge ... And if you think that the opportunity doesn't exist for catastrophe to happen here ... think again. 

There has been a lot of talking 'at' these issues. Lots of people in the City have said they'll monitor this, or 'work with' this person, etc ... Its all a bunch of nonsense so far. Until somebody comes out with a clear plan for solutions, then its all just noise and appeasement of the developers, Ainbinder (& Orr).

Bass Street Petition

Short Week this week folks.
If you haven't seen it or signed it yet, here's a petition to keep Bass Street safe.

BASS STREET PETITION 

(If the link doesn't work, copy paste this): 
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/keepbassstreetsafe/

What's Bass Street? Its a street in the West End that Ainbinder wants to connect to the feeder road going in along I-10 to encourage an additional entrance and exit to the development from the feeder road. Here's a map of the area:

Bass Street is represented on this map by the thin green line.  While not 100% to scale, it mostly is, because the street is roughly 16 ft wide presently. As you may also be able to tell, there are a number of Houses in the vicinity and along the proposed entry route to the Northern portion of the development. These are represented by the word 'Houses' and the Red Lines pointing to them on the map above.

But what  happens if you double the size of the street (about 35' wide) to make it bigger for more access? Totally safe, right?

Au contraire kids. Not only do you have more cars coming through nearer to the houses (See Map Above), you also get trucks trying to make deliveries. This is kind of a dumb idea because it creates an 'arc of doom'. Here's what I mean: 

As you can clearly see, if a Car is parked in the lane going to make a right onto the feeder road (obviously to chase after the other car), then your car will get run over by the truck making the right turn, resulting in the 'Arc of Doom'. Even if it does have armor, machine guns, and spikey things coming out of your wheels, you're still screwed because 18 wheelers are bigger than you and your Honda. 

Hence, please sign the petition, and have a great holiday weekend.

18 Wheelers In the West End

In all fairness, nothing to do with the development as far as I'm aware, but an example of what the city can't do right now ... enforce no trucks in the West End.

This is a picture of Koehler and Thompson Street this morning at about 730am. This truck took about 5 minutes to try to get through. And yes, that is a CoH Public Works truck parked there. He was putting up a No Parking Sign.

The no parking signs are a new feature in the West End. They typically stay up for an average of 3-5 days before they are torn down. Tow Trucks have been coming through the neighborhoods once the signs go up, they tow for a few days, then people tear the signs down and say they didn't know there was no parking there. This is the 3rd time that signs have been put up in this location in the past 2-3 months.

Patterson is presently a 'No Through Trucks' zone, albeit again not enforceable so far. There is still no plan for any improvements to my street ... my street being the one that the Wal-Mart is supposed to be built on.

Ashes to Ashes, Dirt to Dirt

Well, the Lenten season is wrapping up for all of us Catholics out there, so the title comparison seemed appropriate.

The Dirt Bar is now, well, dirt ...

... And as predicted, whomever is responsible for demolition (presumably Ainbinder) is utilizing the Yale Street Bridge already for 18 wheeler traffic.

Its good to know that some public officials however are finally taking note and speaking up on the traffic issues.


I

Water Gets Sprayed Everywhere. Who's Paying for This?

I'm not an expert on demolition.  These were taken at about 7:30am, near the corner of Yale and Koehler street, 77007.  I left my street today to go to work, and saw this going on:

Thats a hose, coming from what looks to be a public fire hydrant, being used to spray down the demolition of the heights apartments.  The Heights apartments were bulldozed last week to make way for the development.

Here's another view:

And a close up of the hose on the hydrant.

Then I drove down Yale a bit, and found one more to the south:

So like the title says, who pays for this?  Is the public funding the demolition now?

Stuff Happened, We're Still Here, No One's Started Building.

Yo.

So, a bunch of 'stuff' has happened (besides me neglecting my blog), and here's a rundown ...

-Swamplot named the Walmart 'Story of the Year' -  This is quite cool, because it means that for all the cage 'rattlin' we did this year, the story endured, and while the work has become less public meetings and media attention, it is still very much active.

-Prop 1 Passed - Another big political story.  This was one of the Mayor's 'big push' items, and it narrowly passed on the November ballot.

-Redistricting passed - Despite the Census saying we don't have 2.1 Million in the city, City Council voted that we did, then they voted to go ahead with Redistricting.

-Mayor Parker Announced Huge Impending Cuts - Lots of public workers are going to be losing jobs shortly ...

-Prop 1 Changed its name to Rebuild Houston, and details have begun to emerge - There's a bunch of stories out there on this, and you can read about it just about everywhere.  I went to one of these meetings the other day, and asked a couple of questions:

-How much does this cost?
-When do we see benefits to the public?

The Mayor Answered that it will cost 'about a couple of million per year', and that through 2018, everyone has to suffer a bit.  The long and short of this is, its going to be an extra fee, the funds collected will go to pay off city debt for the next 7 years, and hopefully the CIP budget will increase by 2018.  So there is no immediate benefit, and we just have to pay more money.

Obviously there are a bunch of people upset about this out there.  Some have filed a lawsuit.  Its hard to sell an extra fee for living in the city when the city's out of money, so package it how you will, the upside to this is nearly a decade away per the Mayor's graphs.

-Mayor Parker is walking some tight ropes in budget discussions - Long story short, everything's gotta be cut, and its not gonna make everyone happy.

Its an election year, and that means that everyone's out to keep their jobs in local government (or get elected to new ones).  So, everything between now and November will be extra criticized and watched.

How does that relate to us and the development ...

Right now, the development has moved very little.  While there may be signs up advertising that there is plenty of retail space available, no dirt has been moved yet.  The city is working on reviewing the TIA, or Traffic impact analysis.  A TIA basically looks at traffic scenarios around a development, and gives folks more information on how building it will affect the community.  A TIA is required by the city, and must be approved, as it sets the plan for how the development will be implemented, and what changes need to be made before it is built.

The first TIA has been submitted, and rejected.  The re-work has been submitted as well.  Civic Clubs have started voicing their concerns.   West End Civic Club sent a letter in as well, which is a pretty big deal.  Basically, all traffic concerns need to be addressed before anything can be approved.

So, RUDH has been presenting PIR's, and not getting much in return.  Its frustrating that we have to ask over and over for public information, and that the city seemingly does not provide all the information we ask for.  But, its been a frustrating process from the getgo, so this shouldn't be too much of a surprise.

There are some big concerns with Traffic and Infrastructure impacts right now, and I'll make a post specifically about that.  But the intent of this post is really to show that there has been a lot going on in Houston with all the players ... City Council Members are constantly reminded, amidst being told of budget cuts and layoffs, of the millions they voted to support the development with.

$130 Million Dollar Budget Shortfall ...
An Estimated 2300 plus city Jobs to be cut ...
$6 Million Dollar Tax Credit to private interests supporting the largest retail company in the world ...

Whats wrong with this picture?